
Argentina and Brazil: structural differences and similarities
Di p l o m a c y , St r a t e g y & po l i t i c S – oc t o b e r /De c e m b e r 2007
14
did not establish the corporative representation system his own Constitution
demanded; in view of prevailing critical circumstances, he kept putting it off
until he was able to achieve it in the liberation spring of the war’s end.
11
It is common knowledge that in 1945 Vargas called for free elections,
pressured by public opinion and by the military, which were tired of his
protracted term and apprehensive about his inclination to draw inspiration
from Perón’s now successful example of mass mobilization. To counter this
impasse, Vargas established two parties, just as did his Argentine model. Perón
had the Labor Party, rmly anchored in the unions and signicantly named after
the English worker’s party; and the Radical Civic Union – Junta Renovadora,
a somewhat loose grouping that included free-standing politicians, many of
them linked to the provincial caudillo-style system. Signicantly, the two parties
were merged into one by Perón with the stroke of a pen soon after his victory
at the 1946 elections, evidencing a verticality tendency and the mighty power
of a leader who acted upon a mass that was already largely mobilized but little
used to joint action.
12
Varguismo’s alliance and its mutations
In Brazil, Vargas also established two parties, both named after the
European social-democratic experience, but could never unify them, not
because he did not want to do it but could not, or rather he did not want to do
it because he knew he could not. For the urban popular sector, newly unionized
but with structures much more dependent on the government than was the
case in Argentina, he established the Brazilian Workers’ Party-PTB. For the
local notables, particularly those in the peripheral states, often conservative
but resentful of the centralist dominion, he established the Social Democratic
Party-PSD, an acronym that, differently from PTB, was merely fanciful.
13
11 José Murilo de Carvalho, “Armed Forces and Politics in Brazil, 1930-45”, Hispanic American Historical Review,
62:2, May 1982, pp. 193-223; Virgínio Santa Rosa, O sentido do tenentismo, 3ª ed., São Paulo, Alfa-Omega, 1976
(1ª ed.,1933); Aspásia Camargo et al., O golpe silencioso, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Fundo Editora, 1989.
12 This is not the place to list the extensive bibliography on the role of the pre-existing unions in the making
of Peronismo or on the degree of autonomy enjoyed by those that joined it. See, for example, Juan Carlos
Torre, Perón y la vieja guardia sindical, Buenos Aires, Sudamericana, 1990, and my somewhat different view, which
stresses the dependence with which union leaders acted, in Perón y los sindicatos, Buenos Aires, Ariel, 2003.
13 Lúcia Hippolito, De raposas e reformistas: o PSD e a experiência democrática brasileira, 1945-64, Rio de Janeiro,
Paz e Terra, 1985; Ângela de Castro Gomes, A invenção do trabalhismo, São Paulo, Vértice/Iuperj, 1988; Edgard
Carone, Movimento operário no Brasil, 1877-1944, São Paulo, Difel, 1979.